Entry tags:
On authors and their own work
I came across this in an article I was reading this morning and thought it had some relevance to the 'JKR's word as canon' debate.
I am inclined to agree with C. S. Lewis who commented on his own book, Till We Have Faces, : "An author doesn't necessarily understand the meaning of his own story better than anyone else..." The act of creation confers no special privileges on authors when it comes to the distinctly different, if lesser, task of interpretation. Wordsworth the critic is not in the same league with Wordsworth the poet, while Samuel Johnson the critic towers over Johnson the creative artist. Authors obviously have something in mind when they write, but a work of historical or theological or aesthetic imagination has a life of its own.
no subject
very muchcompletely with those who claims all JKR says is law. 'tis not. Her books are law. Interviews and such can be used for interpretation, but is not law. Who knows, if Mary had interviewed her, and argued against Harry becoming an auror and for his becoming a life saver instead, maybe they'd agreed. Maybe JKR would've changed her mind, and found Mary to be correct. I think so. But then again, that's my not at all humble opinion.no subject
They pass the time trying to interpret eveything, I mean everything that comes out of JKR's mouth for their ship.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject